Re: Angelina 13.5 year old/13kg Maltese Cross on Trilostane
Hi John,
Regarding information on twice daily dosing, check out page two of the monitoring flowchart for dogs whose clinical signs are not controlled for a full day. It say to slowly increase the dose and divide twice a day. In other words, if a dog is getting 60mg a day, you would increase to something like 80mg divided which would be 40mg twice daily. This is also recommended by UC Davis. This information is not really clear in the article included in the Vetoryl/Trilostane information posted by Marianne, I did verify the UC Davis protocol on twice daily dosing via an audio of one of Dr. Edward Feldman's lectures. He used that exact example I mentioned above.
If a post stim number is within the desired range of 1 - 5 but the dog is still showing overt symptoms, this is a pretty good indication that twice daily dosing should be prescribed. Angelina's post stim was definitely well beyond the desired range. The correct way to determine if a dog needs twice daily dosing is to do a urine cortisol creatinine ratio which requires that the pet owner bring in a urine sample collected the morning before the acth and before meds and meal. If the ratio is abnormal, that is a good indication that the once daily dose is not lasting through the night. It looks like your vet made the call to switch to twice daily dosing based solely on unresolved symptoms that could be explained by the high post stim number as opposed to proof that the current once daily dose was not adequately controlling the cortisol overnight. However, I do recall that you mentioned that Angelina's symptoms seem to get worse at night which your felt was a good indication that twice daily dosing may be necessary.
http://www.dechra-us.com/File/vetory..._Flowchart.pdf
Every dog responds differently and it could be that Angelina will do just fine on a 100% increase in dose; however, I personally don't think that a post stim number 13 ug/dl after only two weeks of treatment is high enough to make me feel comfortable with that kind of an increase. Just be ever vigilant in watching for signs that cortisol may be too low.
I'm not sure about that Trilostane affects a dog's taste in food. It sure had no effect on either one of my chow hound's taste buds. Their appetite did decrease by they never turned their nose up to food. This is definitely a sign that cortisol can be too low and you should never give Trilostane to a dog that is not eating normally. If either one of mine looked the slightest bit off and wasn't doing their normal head dive into the bowl, they were off Trilo for a few days or until they were back to normal. Try eliminating the fish oil on a meal and see if that makes a difference. If not then you can rule that out as a factor which would make Trilostane the bigger suspect.
I am about as far from a medical professional as you can get but I still respectfully disagree with your vets and don't think that Angelina's numbers were that high after only 15 days of dosing. All dogs respond differently to Trilostane so the fact that another Maltese has done well on the same dosing regimen is irrelevant. A perfect example is my two cushdogs. My 4.5 lb Pom was on 30mg once daily for two years and my then 10 lb Pom was on 15mg twice daily and both were effectively controlled.
You know Angelina best so if you think something is not right, and a cushdog that doesn't eat normally is not right, then don't continue to dose her.
Hope this helps.
Glynda aka The Oracle

Hi John,
Regarding information on twice daily dosing, check out page two of the monitoring flowchart for dogs whose clinical signs are not controlled for a full day. It say to slowly increase the dose and divide twice a day. In other words, if a dog is getting 60mg a day, you would increase to something like 80mg divided which would be 40mg twice daily. This is also recommended by UC Davis. This information is not really clear in the article included in the Vetoryl/Trilostane information posted by Marianne, I did verify the UC Davis protocol on twice daily dosing via an audio of one of Dr. Edward Feldman's lectures. He used that exact example I mentioned above.
If a post stim number is within the desired range of 1 - 5 but the dog is still showing overt symptoms, this is a pretty good indication that twice daily dosing should be prescribed. Angelina's post stim was definitely well beyond the desired range. The correct way to determine if a dog needs twice daily dosing is to do a urine cortisol creatinine ratio which requires that the pet owner bring in a urine sample collected the morning before the acth and before meds and meal. If the ratio is abnormal, that is a good indication that the once daily dose is not lasting through the night. It looks like your vet made the call to switch to twice daily dosing based solely on unresolved symptoms that could be explained by the high post stim number as opposed to proof that the current once daily dose was not adequately controlling the cortisol overnight. However, I do recall that you mentioned that Angelina's symptoms seem to get worse at night which your felt was a good indication that twice daily dosing may be necessary.
http://www.dechra-us.com/File/vetory..._Flowchart.pdf
Every dog responds differently and it could be that Angelina will do just fine on a 100% increase in dose; however, I personally don't think that a post stim number 13 ug/dl after only two weeks of treatment is high enough to make me feel comfortable with that kind of an increase. Just be ever vigilant in watching for signs that cortisol may be too low.
I'm not sure about that Trilostane affects a dog's taste in food. It sure had no effect on either one of my chow hound's taste buds. Their appetite did decrease by they never turned their nose up to food. This is definitely a sign that cortisol can be too low and you should never give Trilostane to a dog that is not eating normally. If either one of mine looked the slightest bit off and wasn't doing their normal head dive into the bowl, they were off Trilo for a few days or until they were back to normal. Try eliminating the fish oil on a meal and see if that makes a difference. If not then you can rule that out as a factor which would make Trilostane the bigger suspect.
I am about as far from a medical professional as you can get but I still respectfully disagree with your vets and don't think that Angelina's numbers were that high after only 15 days of dosing. All dogs respond differently to Trilostane so the fact that another Maltese has done well on the same dosing regimen is irrelevant. A perfect example is my two cushdogs. My 4.5 lb Pom was on 30mg once daily for two years and my then 10 lb Pom was on 15mg twice daily and both were effectively controlled.
You know Angelina best so if you think something is not right, and a cushdog that doesn't eat normally is not right, then don't continue to dose her.
Hope this helps.
Glynda aka The Oracle



Comment